Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2016 19:14:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) on Oct 24, 2016 20:29:37 GMT -5
listed as both so i assume so
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Seahawks (Cecil) on Oct 24, 2016 20:34:19 GMT -5
We don't do dual positions in this league.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Seahawks (Cecil) on Oct 24, 2016 20:34:49 GMT -5
We go by Rotoworld depth charts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Seahawks (Cecil) on Oct 24, 2016 20:37:43 GMT -5
But we haven't had a guy listed in 2 diff pos before. But we don't do dual pos
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Seahawks (Cecil) on Oct 24, 2016 20:37:48 GMT -5
But we haven't had a guy listed in 2 diff pos before. But we don't do dual pos
|
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) on Oct 24, 2016 20:43:23 GMT -5
according to the rules i dont see how we cant. it clearly says we follow rotoworlds depth charts. he is listed as both a rb and a wr . and i also dont see anywhere in the rules that says that we dont or that he cant . unwritten rule = bullshit imo
|
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) on Oct 24, 2016 20:48:16 GMT -5
just found this actually
Player Designation
Player Positions will be designated by Rotoworld depth charts. We will not have dual positions. Fantrax generally takes their info from Rotoworld as well. In the event that Fantrax gives a dual designation, we will default to the depth charts listed on Rotoworld.
this still seems to leave this situation as a gray area. so what do we do when roto also gives a duel position and in fact the player plays two positions on a weekly basis?
|
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Bengals (Chris) on Oct 24, 2016 23:45:19 GMT -5
Yeah, as Cecil says, we don't do dual positions in this league, and we're not about to start that again. But, we've never had a situation like this as he also said, and is correct to my recollection. So we'll have to come to some accord on this for the rest of the season. LMs are discussing it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia Eagles (Andrew) on Oct 25, 2016 8:52:19 GMT -5
How about this, whoever owns the player gets to choose which postition they're eligible for but then it's stuck like that forever (even if he's traded) or until rotoworld specifies only one position.
|
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) on Oct 25, 2016 9:00:53 GMT -5
I could agree with that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Seahawks (Cecil) on Oct 25, 2016 9:06:05 GMT -5
How about this, whoever owns the player gets to choose which postition they're eligible for but then it's stuck like that forever (even if he's traded) or until rotoworld specifies only one position. This is what I also had in mind. |
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) on Oct 25, 2016 13:30:07 GMT -5
Well just give me a heads up when you guys come to a decision. I'll bow out of this discussion sinse I own the player in question.
|
|
