|
KC-ARI
Apr 1, 2023 14:41:43 GMT -5
Post by Kansas City Chiefs (Brooks) on Apr 1, 2023 14:41:43 GMT -5
KC Gets: ARI UFA 1st 2023 (1.17)
ARI UFA 2nd 2023 (2.17) TEN 3rd 2023 (3.23) ARI 3rd 2024
ARI Gets: CLE 3rd 2023 (3.05)
I accept. This wasnt exactly the plan I had but it is a little bit of a pivot of sorts. I like getting a pick in 2024, and im hoping to get something good in the UFA draft, but only time will tell there. It was worth the pick downgrade in my eyes.
|
|
|
KC-ARI
Apr 1, 2023 14:44:48 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Arizona Cardinals (Tom) on Apr 1, 2023 14:44:48 GMT -5
I accept
|
|
|
Post by Cleveland Browns (Kevin) on Apr 1, 2023 15:56:44 GMT -5
Veto
|
|
|
KC-ARI
Apr 1, 2023 21:29:42 GMT -5
Post by Washington Commanders (Dave) on Apr 1, 2023 21:29:42 GMT -5
Veto
|
|
|
KC-ARI
Apr 2, 2023 10:20:38 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Jacksonville Jaguars (Jordan) on Apr 2, 2023 10:20:38 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
KC-ARI
Apr 2, 2023 10:54:19 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Carolina Panthers (Justin) on Apr 2, 2023 10:54:19 GMT -5
Veto
|
|
|
KC-ARI
Apr 2, 2023 20:08:36 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Kansas City Chiefs (Brooks) on Apr 2, 2023 20:08:36 GMT -5
So the reasons for the veto are? All of this is for 3rd round picks and FA picks that are looked at by some as not valuable at all. I as the trading team shouldn't have to go out of my way to try and figure out why a trade like this is vetoed. One person made it seem like he trade had to be an even trade. Everyone has different values but it's hard to even know what that is with no feedback on why it's a veto.
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Lions (Christian) on Apr 3, 2023 9:23:31 GMT -5
Veto
|
|
|
KC-ARI
Apr 3, 2023 9:34:54 GMT -5
Post by Chicago Bears (Miller) on Apr 3, 2023 9:34:54 GMT -5
I do think we need to change TRC policy to at least explain why trades are being vetoed. I don't see how the trend of vetoes have been constructive in any manor other than to block a trade form happening.
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) on Apr 3, 2023 10:18:44 GMT -5
Veto.
Please leave comments in the discussion thread and not on the trade review.
Thanks guys. You should know this by now though.
|
|