|
|
Post by Jacksonville Jaguars (Jordan) on Mar 16, 2021 20:45:29 GMT -5
Based on the votes we’re getting, it looks like the LMs have once again prioritized the rule changes that benefit them most, as opposed to the ones that the league wants to see. Feel free to suggest any change you want and put it to a vote if you know what the league wants to see. Until then, I would appreciate it if you’d stop accusing me of having ulterior motives. |
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia Eagles (Andrew) on Mar 16, 2021 21:24:38 GMT -5
I didn’t say ulterior. You’ve never said that this would be in the best interest of the league so there’s no deception going on here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kansas City Chiefs (Brooks) on Mar 17, 2021 8:08:18 GMT -5
While I understand the basis of the discussion and agree with the rationale, wouldn't the same effect be for everyone as long as trades aren't severely unbalanced? In my league at least, I have guys say a little general reason to why they are doing the deal because sometimes you don't get the best offer but have to take it to get at least some value back. But I think its good keeping a TRC as a safety net for the league as a whole and to keep the same for all owners, not to just a select few, which In the end does more harm than a TRC vetoing any deal in good faith.
|
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) on Mar 17, 2021 12:58:22 GMT -5
Trc is fine . Alot of hand ringing about nothing here imo but 🤷
|
|
|
|
Post by Jacksonville Jaguars (Jordan) on Mar 17, 2021 13:01:20 GMT -5
The poll is now at 16 "No" meaning it cannot reach a majority to pass. Poll is locked. No changes.
|
|
