|
JAC-LAC
May 31, 2019 9:08:02 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Detroit Lions (Christian) on May 31, 2019 9:08:02 GMT -5
Were only here to prevent collusion or trades that are so obviously one sided they shouldn't happen. This doesnt fall under either of those 2 categories. I know I'm one of the more liberal trc owners I just dont think we have any business running peoples teams . To that point I know on more then 1 occasion we have lost owners because some dbag goes on day long rants after they make one trade that they dont like. You hate to see it
|
|
|
JAC-LAC
May 31, 2019 9:14:40 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Detroit Lions (Christian) on May 31, 2019 9:14:40 GMT -5
There is no rhyme or reason to vetoing trades apparently. Not sure how this trade is distinguishable from trades that have been vetoed in the past. Oh well, with no clear guidance for TRC members, you’ll get results that are all over the board.
|
|
|
JAC-LAC
May 31, 2019 11:31:58 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Philadelphia Eagles (Andrew) on May 31, 2019 11:31:58 GMT -5
RSJ is a 4 PPG player and LJ Fort is a 29 year old career backup. It’s embarrassing that we even need to devote a thread to this.
|
|
|
JAC-LAC
May 31, 2019 11:35:09 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Detroit Lions (Christian) on May 31, 2019 11:35:09 GMT -5
RSJ is a 4 PPG player and LJ Fort is a 29 year old career backup. It’s embarrassing that we even need to devote a thread to this. You clearly don’t get it. The inconsistency of BUF is what’s embarrassing.
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia Eagles (Andrew) on May 31, 2019 11:39:07 GMT -5
No no I get it. I’m on your side here. I’m just saying it’s embarrassing that he chose a trade that will have zero impact to be inconsistent on.
|
|
|
JAC-LAC
May 31, 2019 11:43:09 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Detroit Lions (Christian) on May 31, 2019 11:43:09 GMT -5
No no I get it. I’m on your side here. I’m just saying it’s embarrassing that he chose a trade that will have zero impact to be inconsistent on. I gotcha, and I agree. That’s why I brought it up. It doesn’t provide much confidence in the TRC with that inconsistency.
|
|
|
Post by Jacksonville Jaguars (Jordan) on May 31, 2019 14:12:01 GMT -5
No hard feelings between myself and Salvatore. He obviously felt we were colluding, or else he wouldn’t have vetoed. He’s not in the business of running other people’s teams, being the liberal voter that he is.
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) on May 31, 2019 14:30:24 GMT -5
Were only here to prevent collusion or trades that are So obviously one sided they shouldn't happen. This doesnt fall under either of those 2 categories. I know I'm one of the more liberal trc owners I just dont think we have any business running peoples teams . To that point I know on more then 1 occasion we have lost owners because some dbag goes on day long rants after they make one trade that they dont like. You hate to see it's a subjective decision which I made. Jags are getting a starting tightend thats going into his 3rd year which is generally when tightends really start hitting there stride with a team who is implamenting a pass happy scheme with a rookie qb in a 32 team league for a linebackers whose going on 30, started maybe a handful of games in his career, couldnt even get on the field with the steelers who were much worst and thinner and his position a year and is now log jammed behind multiple better options . That falls within the parameters for the 2nd part of these criteria imo. That's all it is my opinion and I stand behind it . Rather its collusion or not I couldnt say I haven't looked back to see if theres any trends forming with these teams but I tend to doubt it and assume the rams just didn't look into it deep enough. As far as there posts go. I could really care less. Not even sure why I'm taking the time to defend my opinion but here it is.also Blow it up your ass dude
|
|
|
JAC-LAC
May 31, 2019 14:33:29 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Detroit Lions (Christian) on May 31, 2019 14:33:29 GMT -5
You hate to see it's a subjective decision which I made. Jags are getting a starting tightend thats going into his 3rd year which is generally when tightends really start hitting there stride with a team who is implamenting a pass happy scheme with a rookie qb in a 32 team league for a linebackers whose going on 30, started maybe a handful of games in his career, couldnt even get on the field with the steelers who were much worst and thinner and his position a year and is now log jammed behind multiple better options . That falls within the parameters for the 2nd part of these criteria imo. That's all it is my opinion and I stand behind it . Rather its collusion or not I couldnt say I haven't looked back to see if theres any trends forming with these teams but I tend to doubt it and assume the rams just didn't look into it deep enough. As far as there posts go. I could really care less. Not even sure why I'm taking the time to defend my opinion but here it is.also Blow it up your ass dude Watch your language you potty mouth!
|
|
|
Post by Jacksonville Jaguars (Jordan) on May 31, 2019 14:38:08 GMT -5
You hate to see it's a subjective decision which I made. Jags are getting a starting tightend thats going into his 3rd year which is generally when tightends really start hitting there stride with a team who is implamenting a pass happy scheme with a rookie qb in a 32 team league for a linebackers whose going on 30, started maybe a handful of games in his career, couldnt even get on the field with the steelers who were much worst and thinner and his position a year and is now log jammed behind multiple better options . That falls within the parameters for the 2nd part of these criteria imo. That's all it is my opinion and I stand behind it . Rather its collusion or not I couldnt say I haven't looked back to see if theres any trends forming with these teams but I tend to doubt it and assume the rams just didn't look into it deep enough. As far as there posts go. I could really care less. Not even sure why I'm taking the time to defend my opinion but here it is.also Blow it up your ass dude Not sure whose ass you’re referring to. If it’s mine, you’re forgiven. If it’s Christian’s, I hope he finds it in his heart to forgive you as well. But some wounds just cut too deep. But like I said, no hard feelings between us.
|
|