Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2017 18:58:37 GMT -5
Yeah. I just wanted to know. Cause I know qbs are going down left and right.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2017 18:59:07 GMT -5
I thank you all. Maybe throw it in the qb rules saying we could do everyone knows
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2017 19:24:40 GMT -5
I had actually offered Trey EJ as a replacement for Carr and he did decline and I saw yesterday Glennon was benched but EJ had already played so I couldn't make the switch. Sorry like I said before I'm not watching football so didn't see it in time. As far as having to drop a starting QB if you end up with 2 starters due to injury I don't think was ever a rule but I do remember having to give up Cousins cheap at some point a couple years ago but can't remember the exact reason maybe it was that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2017 6:19:05 GMT -5
Same here we were in the same boat
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2017 8:24:32 GMT -5
Well Hogan has been named the starter, even though rotoworld does not list him as the starter yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Seahawks (Cecil) on Oct 11, 2017 8:38:52 GMT -5
Cin should not be eligible for him. Named starter
|
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Bengals (Chris) on Oct 11, 2017 8:53:07 GMT -5
Cin should not be eligible for him. Named starter Again guys, this is a rule we have not enforced before in this league or the NFFL. So I don't understand the selective enforcement of it. Including by someone who has rostered two starting QBs during the season just three years ago. Additionally, when the bid was made, he was not named the starter, and that is still not reflected as the starter on the Rotoworld depth charts. So even if we were to selectively enforce the rule for the first time, that would not be going by the rule. |
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) on Oct 11, 2017 8:56:44 GMT -5
If the rule says you cant bid on a starting qb if you own one. Then you are violating the rule chris. This isn't hard to understand. Why write the rule if your going to ignore it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) on Oct 11, 2017 8:57:57 GMT -5
That is a valid point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Bengals (Chris) on Oct 11, 2017 9:03:47 GMT -5
What does the current Rotoworld depth chart say?
|
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Seahawks (Cecil) on Oct 11, 2017 9:13:31 GMT -5
You know rotoworld takes thier time on updates. They themselves blurbed that hogan is the starter. They acknowledged that fact. It was announced before you acquired him. I don't think you would have this stance if another person was trying to acquire a 2nd starter thru ufa.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnati Bengals (Chris) on Oct 11, 2017 9:21:45 GMT -5
It's a simple question though. If we're enforcing the rule for the first time, the rule says we go by Rotoworld depth charts. Can any of you tell me who is currently listed as the Cleveland starter by Rotoworld depth charts?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jacksonville Jaguars (Jordan) on Oct 11, 2017 9:21:54 GMT -5
No offense Cecil, but I think history has proven that Chris would not have had a problem with it if it were someone else. I am speaking from experience, as I did the same thing last year, and there was no such issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia Eagles (Andrew) on Oct 11, 2017 9:25:27 GMT -5
I'm fine with Chris doing this as long as I don't get called out for doing the same thing later on. Hogan wasn't the starter when he acquired him. There shouldn't be a problem.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2017 9:25:37 GMT -5
I will say this, I was very vocal about allowing JAX to do this last year and said we are setting ourselves up for future issues.
In a league with 32 teams, a GM should not be allowed to pick up another starting QB as a bye week replacement. |
|
