LAR-KC

[Detroit Lions (Christian)]

Lmao

[Cincinnati Bengals (Chris)]

Moving this to Discussions

[Detroit Lions (Christian)]

Apparently it was fair enough to get two approvals already, so I’ll hold my tongue on explaining this one.

[Jacksonville Jaguars (Jordan)]

I would like to hear an explanation from both sides before I vote. Specifically don’t see what KC stands to gain from this, as they are rebuilding but one of the major pieces she is getting back is a 40 year old QB on a terrible contract that she will be only renting for this year.

[Buffalo Bills (Salvatore)]

Idk Lamar jackson is trash and she has 2 1st next year 🤷‍♂️

[Jacksonville Jaguars (Jordan)]

Marlon Mack and Gus Edwards are also not comparable.

[Detroit Lions (Christian)]

May 18, 2019 20:04:33 GMT -5 Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) said:

Idk Lamar jackson is trash and she has 2 1st next year 🤷‍♂️

Oh yeah, makes sense. Fuck it. Two 1st’s. Approve.

[Buffalo Bills (Salvatore)]

Biggest question mark In the deal for me is the rb swop mostly because I'm not sold on Edwards at all but Its not collusion and the compensations not lopsided enough for a veto imo

[Buffalo Bills (Salvatore)]

Next year has a solid qb class. Her pick should be plenty high to net an actual good qb and now she has ammunition to get another starter for jackson and some change basicly

[Detroit Lions (Christian)]

May 18, 2019 20:11:34 GMT -5 Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) said:

Next year has a solid qb class. Her pick should be plenty high to net an actual good qb and now she has ammunition to get another starter for jackson and some change basicly

You’re reasoning behind your approval is clouded by your opinion of Jackson. You shouldn’t have voted.

[Buffalo Bills (Salvatore)]

It isnt . Its aimed by my understanding of how these kind of leagues work. If she wants to compete long term getting a viable starting QB in a loaded qb class next year and finding value for her existing QB is actually a really good move. Like I said my only hesitation was the running back swop. William's is a rental.  eveb if it were Jackson for a future 1 straight up I dont think its amazing or anything but its not collusion and honestly I totally understand the thinking

[Deleted]

So you're argument is that her pick will be high enough for a QB next year? Her pick isn't invloved in the trade she already has it to grab a QB. She's trading away a RB with top 10 potential and idk what she's getting in return.

[Buffalo Bills (Salvatore)]

The rb thing is totally subjective . if the trade were mack for Edwards straight up could you veto that ? Idk man 720 yard in 8 games is pretty damn impressive and ravens are going to run the ball about 2000 times next year. it's not like mack has been durable. If jackson plays like he did last year shes taking a qb next year and hoping someone gives up a high pick for him which i doubt happens.

[Detroit Lions (Christian)]

May 18, 2019 20:39:07 GMT -5 Buffalo Bills (Salvatore) said:

The rb thing is totally subjective . if the trade were mack for Edwards straight up could you veto that ? Idk man 720 yard in 8 games is pretty damn impressive and ravens are going to run the ball about 2000 times next year. it's not like mack has been durable. If jackson plays like he did last year shes taking a qb next year and hoping someone gives up a high pick for him which i doubt happens.

Are Mark Ingram & Justice Hill jokes to you?

[Deleted]

You think Edwards=Mack? The Ravens added Hill and Ingram. Gus will only get touches if there is an injury.